Saturday (8/1), I had a brief comment exchange with both Jason Falls (SME) and Mark Schaefer {grow}. And those exchanges inspired this topic.
Before I offer up my opinion, let me say that I’ve only been doing this “blog thing” for a short time. Initially, I was just an avid reader of many other peoples’ blogs. But, somewhere along the way, I made the decision to become an active participant in the active “conversation.”
At the time I made that decision, there was an evolving (and revolving) conversation taking place regarding to the “death” of PR.
Let me add that the intent of my blogging is not to make me a media rock star. I actually blog because I know that my clients are “following” me…and because doing it offers them further insight into my developing mindset(s). Which is exactly why I don’t solicit comments, or use Twitter®. (Please, no more emails asking why?)
As you may know, my career started at Doyle Dane Bernbach/Los Angeles, during the time it became DDB/Needham. At that time, the agency encouraged those involved in media, creative, account service, and public relations to hold open discussion(s) about how we could find “new” ways to leverage and integrate our crafted brand-building messages. It was understood that - although the participants reflected several different disciplines - the focus should always be on an integrated message.
Now, before all of you start shouting that the message is no longer in control of the “brand,” let me say that I agree. But, in reality, it never has been. I would also suggest, for that reason alone, that we continue to find so many individual disciplines within the marketing communications field.
PR, in point of fact, is far from being “dead.” Creative and attention-grabbing messaging is alive and well, as is the selection of medium to deliver those messages. Conversation has been going on since the beginning of time; and since the beginning of time, it has never been totally-positive toward any brand. Finding a way to control the chaos, then, is really what building a strong brand is all about.
So - for the sake of my own sanity in the midst of all this chaos - here are a couple of things I‘ve decided for now:
1. Social networking is a discipline of PR.
2. Social networking is a discipline of Product Development.
3. Social networking is a discipline of Customer Service.
4. Social Networking is a discipline of Research.
5. I, personally, no longer care if you choose to call it “social media,” “social marketing,” “conversational marketing”…or even if you consider it a newly-found religion.
6. An integrated branding approach is just as relevant today as it was decades ago.
7. A strong “brand” presence is the most effective way to (try to) control the chaos…or, at least, contain it.
8. The more things change…the more they stay the same. Focus, People